On 2018年07月20日 18:17, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
> chunk type BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA and BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA
> should not be set in a non-mixed chunk at the same time.
> 
> Since BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA is 0x4 and BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA is 0x1,
> BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA will be 0x0,
> so we should judge type is one of them separately.
> 
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <g...@cn.fujitsu.com>

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>

Thanks,
Qu

> ---
> Changelog:
>  v2: As comment by Qu, change the print format of bit from %llu to 0x%llx.
> 
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 3f2f01ad9356..d61c604b280c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -6360,7 +6360,7 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info 
> *fs_info,
>       }
>       if (~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) &
>           type) {
> -             btrfs_err(fs_info, "unrecognized chunk type: %llu",
> +             btrfs_err(fs_info, "unrecognized chunk type: 0x%llx",
>                         ~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK |
>                           BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) &
>                         btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk));
> @@ -6368,14 +6368,14 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct 
> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>       }
>  
>       if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) == 0) {
> -             btrfs_err(fs_info, "missing chunk type flag: %llu", type);
> +             btrfs_err(fs_info, "missing chunk type flag: 0x%llx", type);
>               return -EIO;
>       }
>  
>       if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) &&
>           (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA))) {
>               btrfs_err(fs_info,
> -                     "system chunk with data or metadata type: %llu", type);
> +             "system chunk with data or metadata type: 0x%llx", type);
>               return -EIO;
>       }
>  
> @@ -6384,10 +6384,10 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct 
> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>               mixed = 1;
>  
>       if (!mixed) {
> -             if (type &
> -                 (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) {
> +             if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA) &&
> +                     (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) {
>                       btrfs_err(fs_info,
> -                     "mixed chunk type in non-mixed mode: %llu", type);
> +                     "mixed chunk type in non-mixed mode: 0x%llx", type);
>                       return -EIO;
>               }
>       }
> @@ -6400,7 +6400,7 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info 
> *fs_info,
>           ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) == 0 &&
>            num_stripes != 1)) {
>               btrfs_err(fs_info,
> -                     "invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile 
> %llu",
> +                     "invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile 
> 0x%llx",
>                       num_stripes, sub_stripes,
>                       type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK);
>               return -EIO;
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to