Since commit a79a464d5675 ("btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty
subvolume"), rm -r can delete a subvolume too.This test assumes that rm -r does not delete a subvolume. Currently the commit does not affect the test since qgroup items still exist after subvolume deletion, but we plan to change the behavior and remove them along with subvolume deletion. So update the test and keep subvolume (and qgroup item) in any kernel version. Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomoh...@jp.fujitsu.com> --- tests/btrfs/057 | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/btrfs/057 b/tests/btrfs/057 index 6743f774..b019f4e1 100755 --- a/tests/btrfs/057 +++ b/tests/btrfs/057 @@ -53,8 +53,9 @@ run_check $FSSTRESS_PROG -d $SCRATCH_MNT/snap1 -w -p 5 -n 1000 \ _run_btrfs_util_prog quota enable $SCRATCH_MNT _run_btrfs_util_prog quota rescan -w $SCRATCH_MNT -# ignore removing subvolume errors -rm -rf $SCRATCH_MNT/* >& /dev/null +# remove all file/dir other than subvolume +rm -rf $SCRATCH_MNT/snap1/* >& /dev/null +rm -rf $SCRATCH_MNT/p* >& /dev/null _run_btrfs_util_prog filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT units=`_btrfs_qgroup_units` -- 2.14.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
