On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com> wrote:
> We want to release the unused reservation we have since it refills the
> delayed refs reserve, which will make everything go smoother when
> running the delayed refs if we're short on our reservation.
>

Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo....@linux.alibaba.com>

thanks,
liubo

> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
> index 99741254e27e..ebb0c0405598 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
> @@ -1915,6 +1915,9 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle 
> *trans)
>                 return ret;
>         }
>
> +       btrfs_trans_release_metadata(trans);
> +       trans->block_rsv = NULL;
> +
>         /* make a pass through all the delayed refs we have so far
>          * any runnings procs may add more while we are here
>          */
> @@ -1924,9 +1927,6 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle 
> *trans)
>                 return ret;
>         }
>
> -       btrfs_trans_release_metadata(trans);
> -       trans->block_rsv = NULL;
> -
>         cur_trans = trans->transaction;
>
>         /*
> --
> 2.14.3
>

Reply via email to