It might get @leaf and @key in order to do some sanity checks on key's
fields, but since we don't check it any more, it's fine to remove the
code.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo....@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index d3febc3a6bc0..fd64d7ac76f9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3911,9 +3911,7 @@ static int __btrfs_unlink_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle 
*trans,
        struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
        struct btrfs_path *path;
        int ret = 0;
-       struct extent_buffer *leaf;
        struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
-       struct btrfs_key key;
        u64 index;
        u64 ino = btrfs_ino(inode);
        u64 dir_ino = btrfs_ino(dir);
@@ -3935,8 +3933,6 @@ static int __btrfs_unlink_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle 
*trans,
                ret = -ENOENT;
                goto err;
        }
-       leaf = path->nodes[0];
-       btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, di, &key);
        ret = btrfs_delete_one_dir_name(trans, root, path, di);
        if (ret)
                goto err;
-- 
1.8.3.1

Reply via email to