On 2018/9/13 上午4:49, damenly...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Su Yue <suy.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> In check_dir_item, we are going to search corresponding
> dir_item/index.
>
> Commit 564901eac7a4 ("btrfs-progs: check: introduce
> print_dir_item_err()") Changed argument name from key to di_key but
> forgot to change the key name for dir_item search.
> So @key shouldn't be used here. It should be @di_key.
>
> Fixes: 564901eac7a4 ("btrfs-progs: check: introduce print_dir_item_err()")
Which also forgot to modify comment about parameters.
> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> check/mode-lowmem.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/check/mode-lowmem.c b/check/mode-lowmem.c
> index 1bce44f5658a..89a304bbdd69 100644
> --- a/check/mode-lowmem.c
> +++ b/check/mode-lowmem.c
> @@ -1658,7 +1658,7 @@ begin:
>
> /* check relative INDEX/ITEM */
> key.objectid = di_key->objectid;
> - if (key.type == BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY) {
> + if (di_key->type == BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY) {
To avoid such problem, I recommend to rename @key to @search_key, and
move the declaration inside the while loop.
Thanks,
Qu
> key.type = BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY;
> key.offset = index;
> } else {
>
