On 9/25/18 8:06 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Since we're following the name size limit of linux, just use NAME_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 53af9f5253f4..5ab6d1f6e055 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_sum;
* we can actually store much bigger names, but lets not confuse the rest
* of linux
*/
-#define BTRFS_NAME_LEN 255
+#define BTRFS_NAME_LEN NAME_MAX
/*
* Theoretical limit is larger, but we keep this down to a sane
