On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 03:16:55PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osan...@fb.com>
>
> The only aops we define for symlinks are identical to the aops for
> regular files. This has been the case since symlink support was added in
> commit 2b8d99a723a3 ("Btrfs: symlinks and hard links"). As far as I can
> tell, there wasn't a good reason to have separate aops then, and there
> isn't now, so let's just do what most other filesystems do and reuse the
> same structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osan...@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Can we also reuse btrfs_inode_operations for
btrfs_special_inode_operations ? The only difference is the fiemap
operation, so if the special files must not implement that callback,
this could be decided inside that.
