On 12.10.2018 09:26, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> The member log_root_transid is never used.
> It's always kept untouched even when updating log tree root.
>
> And populating it without introducing new incompat flags could easily
> cause back-compatibility problems.
> So just mark it unused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> index 53af9f5253f4..9adc53db679a 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> @@ -214,8 +214,8 @@ struct btrfs_super_block {
> __le64 chunk_root;
> __le64 log_root;
>
> - /* this will help find the new super based on the log root */
> - __le64 log_root_transid;
> + /* This member is never touched, should always be 0 */
> + __le64 __unused_log_root_transid;
no need to be that descriptive, that's the whole idea of switching the
parameter's name. Just use "reserved1" or "unused" or "padding", also
the name is eloquent enough that the comment is redundant.
> __le64 total_bytes;
> __le64 bytes_used;
> __le64 root_dir_objectid;
> @@ -2317,8 +2317,6 @@ BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_chunk_root_level, struct
> btrfs_super_block,
> chunk_root_level, 8);
> BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_log_root, struct btrfs_super_block,
> log_root, 64);
> -BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_log_root_transid, struct btrfs_super_block,
> - log_root_transid, 64);
> BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_log_root_level, struct btrfs_super_block,
> log_root_level, 8);
> BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_total_bytes, struct btrfs_super_block,
>
