On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:57 PM Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com> wrote:
>
> If we use up our block group before allocating a new one we'll easily
> get a max_extent_size that's set really really low, which will result in
> a lot of fragmentation. We need to make sure we're resetting the
> max_extent_size when we add a new chunk or add new space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdman...@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index cd2280962c8c..f84537a1d7eb 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -4573,6 +4573,7 @@ static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle
> *trans, u64 flags,
> goto out;
> } else {
> ret = 1;
> + space_info->max_extent_size = 0;
> }
>
> space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE;
> @@ -6671,6 +6672,7 @@ static int btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct
> btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
> space_info->bytes_readonly += num_bytes;
> cache->reserved -= num_bytes;
> space_info->bytes_reserved -= num_bytes;
> + space_info->max_extent_size = 0;
>
> if (delalloc)
> cache->delalloc_bytes -= num_bytes;
> --
> 2.14.3
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
“Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”
