On 25.09.18 г. 21:38 ч., Timofey Titovets wrote:
> Currently btrfs raid1/10 balancer bаlance requests to mirrors,
> based on pid % num of mirrors.
>
> Make logic understood:
> - if one of underline devices are non rotational
> - Queue length to underline devices
>
> By default try use pid % num_mirrors guessing, but:
> - If one of mirrors are non rotational, repick optimal to it
> - If underline mirror have less queue length then optimal,
> repick to that mirror
>
> For avoid round-robin request balancing,
> lets round down queue length:
> - By 8 for rotational devs
> - By 2 for all non rotational devs
>
> Some bench results from mail list
> (Dmitrii Tcvetkov <demfl...@demfloro.ru>):
> Benchmark summary (arithmetic mean of 3 runs):
> Mainline Patch
> ------------------------------------
> RAID1 | 18.9 MiB/s | 26.5 MiB/s
> RAID10 | 30.7 MiB/s | 30.7 MiB/s
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> mainline, fio got lucky to read from first HDD (quite slow HDD):
> Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)][100.0%][r=8456KiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=264,w=0 IOPS]
> read: IOPS=265, BW=8508KiB/s (8712kB/s)(499MiB/60070msec)
> lat (msec): min=2, max=825, avg=60.17, stdev=65.06
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> mainline, fio got lucky to read from second HDD (much more modern):
> Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)][8.7%][r=11.9MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=380,w=0 IOPS]
> read: IOPS=378, BW=11.8MiB/s (12.4MB/s)(710MiB/60051msec)
> lat (usec): min=416, max=644286, avg=42312.74, stdev=48518.56
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> mainline, fio got lucky to read from an SSD:
> Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)][100.0%][r=436MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=13.9k,w=0 IOPS]
> read: IOPS=13.9k, BW=433MiB/s (454MB/s)(25.4GiB/60002msec)
> lat (usec): min=343, max=16319, avg=1152.52, stdev=245.36
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> With the patch, 2 HDDs:
> Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)][100.0%][r=17.5MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=560,w=0 IOPS]
> read: IOPS=560, BW=17.5MiB/s (18.4MB/s)(1053MiB/60052msec)
> lat (usec): min=435, max=341037, avg=28511.64, stdev=30000.14
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> With the patch, HDD(old one)+SSD:
> Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)][100.0%][r=371MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=11.9k,w=0 IOPS]
> read: IOPS=11.6k, BW=361MiB/s (379MB/s)(21.2GiB/60084msec)
> lat (usec): min=363, max=346752, avg=1381.73, stdev=6948.32
>
> Changes:
> v1 -> v2:
> - Use helper part_in_flight() from genhd.c
> to get queue length
> - Move guess code to guess_optimal()
> - Change balancer logic, try use pid % mirror by default
> Make balancing on spinning rust if one of underline devices
> are overloaded
> v2 -> v3:
> - Fix arg for RAID10 - use sub_stripes, instead of num_stripes
> v3 -> v4:
> - Rebased on latest misc-next
> v4 -> v5:
> - Rebased on latest misc-next
> v5 -> v6:
> - Fix spelling
> - Include bench results
>
> Signed-off-by: Timofey Titovets <nefelim...@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Dmitrii Tcvetkov <demfl...@demfloro.ru>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitrii Tcvetkov <demfl...@demfloro.ru>
> ---
> block/genhd.c | 1 +
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index 9656f9e9f99e..5ea5acc88d3c 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ void part_in_flight(struct request_queue *q, struct
> hd_struct *part,
> atomic_read(&part->in_flight[1]);
> }
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(part_in_flight);
>
> void part_in_flight_rw(struct request_queue *q, struct hd_struct *part,
> unsigned int inflight[2])
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index c95af358b71f..fa7dd6ac087f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/raid/pq.h>
> #include <linux/semaphore.h>
> #include <linux/uuid.h>
> +#include <linux/genhd.h>
> #include <linux/list_sort.h>
> #include "ctree.h"
> #include "extent_map.h"
> @@ -5201,6 +5202,111 @@ int btrfs_is_parity_mirror(struct btrfs_fs_info
> *fs_info, u64 logical, u64 len)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * bdev_get_queue_len - return rounded down in flight queue length of bdev
> + *
> + * @bdev: target bdev
> + * @round_down: round factor big for hdd and small for ssd, like 8 and 2
> + */
> +static int bdev_get_queue_len(struct block_device *bdev, int round_down)
> +{
> + int sum;
> + struct hd_struct *bd_part = bdev->bd_part;
> + struct request_queue *rq = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> + uint32_t inflight[2] = {0, 0};
> +
> + part_in_flight(rq, bd_part, inflight);
> +
> + sum = max_t(uint32_t, inflight[0], inflight[1]);
> +
> + /*
> + * Try prevent switch for every sneeze
> + * By roundup output num by some value
> + */
> + return ALIGN_DOWN(sum, round_down);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * guess_optimal - return guessed optimal mirror
> + *
> + * Optimal expected to be pid % num_stripes
> + *
> + * That's generaly ok for spread load
> + * Add some balancer based on queue length to device
> + *
> + * Basic ideas:
> + * - Sequential read generate low amount of request
> + * so if load of drives are equal, use pid % num_stripes balancing
> + * - For mixed rotate/non-rotate mirrors, pick non-rotate as optimal
> + * and repick if other dev have "significant" less queue length
> + * - Repick optimal if queue length of other mirror are less
> + */
> +static int guess_optimal(struct map_lookup *map, int num, int optimal)
> +{
> + int i;
> + int round_down = 8;
> + int qlen[num];
> + bool is_nonrot[num];
> + bool all_bdev_nonrot = true;
> + bool all_bdev_rotate = true;
> + struct block_device *bdev;
> +
> + if (num == 1)
> + return optimal;
Can this check ever trigger, given that find_live_mirror is called only
from raid1/raid10 code paths in __btrfs_map_block. Even if one of the
devices is missing (which for raid10 should be catastrophic) there is a
check whether the devices are missing and so nothing is submitted.
> +
> + /* Check accessible bdevs */
> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + /* Init for missing bdevs */
> + is_nonrot[i] = false;
> + qlen[i] = INT_MAX;
> + bdev = map->stripes[i].dev->bdev;
> + if (bdev) {
> + qlen[i] = 0;
> + is_nonrot[i] = blk_queue_nonrot(bdev_get_queue(bdev));
> + if (is_nonrot[i])
> + all_bdev_rotate = false;
> + else
> + all_bdev_nonrot = false;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Don't bother with computation
> + * if only one of two bdevs are accessible
> + */
> + if (num == 2 && qlen[0] != qlen[1]) {
Based on my assumptions on the previous usage of num I don't think num
can be different than 2 (even with missing devices). So I believe this
check is redundant. I'd rather put an ASSERT(num == 2) at the top of
this function.
> + if (qlen[0] < qlen[1])
> + return 0;
> + else
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (all_bdev_nonrot)
> + round_down = 2;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + if (qlen[i])
> + continue;
> + bdev = map->stripes[i].dev->bdev;
> + qlen[i] = bdev_get_queue_len(bdev, round_down);
> + }
> +
> + /* For mixed case, pick non rotational dev as optimal */
> + if (all_bdev_rotate == all_bdev_nonrot) {
> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + if (is_nonrot[i])
> + optimal = i;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + if (qlen[optimal] > qlen[i])
> + optimal = i;
> + }
If my assumption that num is always 2 then all of these 'for' loops can
be replaced with simple 'if (qlen[0] > qlen[1]) foo'
> +
> + return optimal;
> +}
> +
> static int find_live_mirror(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> struct map_lookup *map, int first,
> int dev_replace_is_ongoing)
> @@ -5219,7 +5325,8 @@ static int find_live_mirror(struct btrfs_fs_info
> *fs_info,
> else
> num_stripes = map->num_stripes;
>
> - preferred_mirror = first + current->pid % num_stripes;
> + preferred_mirror = first + guess_optimal(map, num_stripes,
> + current->pid % num_stripes);
>
> if (dev_replace_is_ongoing &&
> fs_info->dev_replace.cont_reading_from_srcdev_mode ==
>
