On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 04:45:37PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > @@ -5819,9 +5953,10 @@ static void init_global_block_rsv(struct > > btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) > > fs_info->trans_block_rsv.space_info = space_info; > > fs_info->empty_block_rsv.space_info = space_info; > > fs_info->delayed_block_rsv.space_info = space_info; > > + fs_info->delayed_refs_rsv.space_info = space_info; > > > > - fs_info->extent_root->block_rsv = &fs_info->global_block_rsv; > > - fs_info->csum_root->block_rsv = &fs_info->global_block_rsv; > > + fs_info->extent_root->block_rsv = &fs_info->delayed_refs_rsv; > > + fs_info->csum_root->block_rsv = &fs_info->delayed_refs_rsv; > > nit: Some whitespace damage
No, the removed part is global_block_rsv and added is delayed_refs_rsv.
