On 21/02/2019 12:57, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > static int cow_file_range_async(struct inode *inode, struct page > *locked_page, > @@ -1190,45 +1201,68 @@ static int cow_file_range_async(struct inode *inode, > struct page *locked_page, > unsigned int write_flags) > { > struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb); > - struct async_cow *async_cow; > + struct async_cow *ctx; > + struct async_chunk *async_cow;
In case you have to re-send the patch you could maybe rename the async_cow variable to async_chunk or sth like that. Would make the resulting code a little bit clearer but no strong opinions here. Anyways, Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de> -- Johannes Thumshirn SUSE Labs Filesystems jthumsh...@suse.de +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850