On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:14:00PM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Since commit c40a3d38aff4 ("Btrfs: Compute and look up csums based on
> sectorsized blocks") we do a kmap_atomic() on the contents of a bvec.
>
> kmap_atomic() in turn does a preempt_disable() and pagefault_disable(),
> so we shouldn't map the data for too long. Reduce the time the bvec's
> page is mapped to when we actually need it.
>
> Performance wise it doesn't seem to make a huge difference with a 2 vcpu VM
> on a /dev/zram device:
>
> vanilla patched delta
> write 17.4MiB/s 17.8MiB/s +0.4MiB/s (+2%)
> read 40.6MiB/s 41.5MiB/s +0.9MiB/s (+2%)
>
> The following fio job profile was used in the comparision:
>
> [global]
> ioengine=libaio
> direct=1
> sync=1
> norandommap
> time_based
> runtime=10m
> size=100m
> group_reporting
> numjobs=2
>
> [test]
> filename=/mnt/test/fio
> rw=randrw
> rwmixread=70
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> index 920bf3b4b0ef..aa40e66df1e1 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> @@ -453,8 +453,6 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct inode *inode,
> struct bio *bio,
> BUG_ON(!ordered); /* Logic error */
> }
>
> - data = kmap_atomic(bvec.bv_page);
> -
> nr_sectors = BTRFS_BYTES_TO_BLKS(fs_info,
> bvec.bv_len +
> fs_info->sectorsize
> - 1);
> @@ -464,7 +462,6 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct inode *inode,
> struct bio *bio,
> offset < ordered->file_offset) {
> unsigned long bytes_left;
>
> - kunmap_atomic(data);
> sums->len = this_sum_bytes;
> this_sum_bytes = 0;
> btrfs_add_ordered_sum(inode, ordered, sums);
> @@ -482,16 +479,16 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct inode *inode,
> struct bio *bio,
> sums->bytenr = ((u64)bio->bi_iter.bi_sector <<
> 9)
> + total_bytes;
> index = 0;
> -
> - data = kmap_atomic(bvec.bv_page);
> }
>
> sums->sums[index] = ~(u32)0;
> + data = kmap_atomic(bvec.bv_page);
> sums->sums[index]
> = btrfs_csum_data(data + bvec.bv_offset
> + (i * fs_info->sectorsize),
> sums->sums[index],
> fs_info->sectorsize);
> + kunmap_atomic(data);
The code before c40a3d38aff4 did exactly this, ie. kmap only around the
checksumming. I don't actually see anywhere from the context why it
would need to be around the whole bvec as none of the operations uses
that.
So I think your patch is correct.
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
