On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 06:01:16PM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote: > > [ 7731.355111] BTRFS info (device vda): disk space caching is enabled > > [ 7731.358367] BTRFS info (device vda): has skinny extents > > [ 7731.407393] BTRFS: device fsid 99c22651-33bd-4543-96df-da02cc320166 > > devid 1 transid 5 /dev/vdb > > [ 7731.419081] BTRFS info (device vdb): disk space caching is enabled > > [ 7731.420671] BTRFS info (device vdb): has skinny extents > > [ 7731.421955] BTRFS info (device vdb): flagging fs with big metadata > > feature > > [ 7731.426107] BTRFS info (device vdb): checking UUID tree > > [ 7865.389231] BTRFS info (device vdb): disk space caching is enabled > > [ 7865.393289] BTRFS info (device vdb): has skinny extents > > [02:17:19]- output mismatch (see /tmp/fstests/results//generic/102.out.bad) > > --- tests/generic/102.out 2018-10-08 09:51:53.890556726 +0000 > > +++ /tmp/fstests/results//generic/102.out.bad 2019-04-09 > > 02:17:19.460000000 +0000 > > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > > QA output created by 102 > > wrote 838860800/838860800 bytes at offset 0 > > XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) > > -wrote 838860800/838860800 bytes at offset 0 > > +wrote 109707264/838860800 bytes at offset 0 > > XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) > > wrote 838860800/838860800 bytes at offset 0 > > ... > > (Run 'diff -u /tmp/fstests/tests/generic/102.out > > /tmp/fstests/results//generic/102.out.bad' to see the entire diff) > > Unrelated to this patch. > The test fails often for at least a few kernel releases now.
Ok noted, thanks. After checking more logs, the test indeed fails, though I see only a few failures in past week so it was a conincidence that it happened just around this patch.
