On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 01:54:37PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> While fixing the failing ASSERT in device replace finishing procedure I also 
> found several oddities/bugs. Here is the resultant pile.
> 
> First 3 patches are a couple simple cleanups.
> 
> Patch 4 fixes a real bug since btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev accesses values
> which might be updated by transaction commit, so naturally it should be called
> after the transaction is actually committed. I think this should go to 
> stable. 
> 
> Patch 5 cleanups unlocking code in btrfs_dev_replace_start removing a goto 
> label 
> and a local variable. 
> 
> Patch 6 also fixes a bug, since persisting the dev-replace item relied on 
> global 
> reserve being able to satisfy the condition. While this is not wrong per-se I 
> find it somewhat subtle, so just be explicit and start a transaction with 
> reservation for at least 1 item.
> 
> Patch 7 fixes the race condition which caused the newly added ASSERT to 
> trigger. 
> I've added the Fixes: tag to point to the first commit which introduced 
> taking 
> chunk_mutex. This is also stable material. 
> 
> Patch 8 is also a minor cleanup, just removing what I believe to be a 
> redundant 
> assignment. 
> 
> This series went under multiple xfstest runs and no regressions were 
> observed. 
> 
> Nikolay Borisov (8):
>   btrfs: Don't opencode sync_blockdev in btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev
>   btrfs: Reduce critical section in btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev
>   btrfs: Remove impossible WARN_ON
>   btrfs: Ensure btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev sees up to date values
>   btrfs: Streamline replace sem unlock in btrfs_dev_replace_start
>   btrfs: Explicitly reserve space for devreplace item
>   btrfs: Ensure replaced device doesn't have pending chunk allocation
>   btrfs: Remove redundant assignment of tgt_device->commit_total_bytes

Added as topic branch and to for-next will be moved to misc-next soon.

Reply via email to