On 30.05.19 г. 19:31 ч., David Sterba wrote:
> The blocking_writers is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock,
> so we don't need the atomic_t semantics.>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c  |  2 +-
>  fs/btrfs/extent_io.h  |  2 +-
>  fs/btrfs/locking.c    | 46 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  fs/btrfs/print-tree.c |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 2f38c10d2bfb..57b6de9df7c4 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -4823,7 +4823,7 @@ __alloc_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, 
> u64 start,
>       eb->bflags = 0;
>       rwlock_init(&eb->lock);
>       atomic_set(&eb->blocking_readers, 0);
> -     atomic_set(&eb->blocking_writers, 0);
> +     eb->blocking_writers = 0;
>       eb->lock_nested = false;
>       init_waitqueue_head(&eb->write_lock_wq);
>       init_waitqueue_head(&eb->read_lock_wq);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> index aa18a16a6ed7..201da61dfc21 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ struct extent_buffer {
>       struct rcu_head rcu_head;
>       pid_t lock_owner;
>  
> -     atomic_t blocking_writers;
> +     int blocking_writers;
>       atomic_t blocking_readers;
>       bool lock_nested;
>       /* >= 0 if eb belongs to a log tree, -1 otherwise */
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> index 2f6c3c7851ed..5feb01147e19 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> @@ -111,10 +111,10 @@ void btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(struct extent_buffer 
> *eb)
>        */
>       if (eb->lock_nested && current->pid == eb->lock_owner)
>               return;
> -     if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0) {
> +     if (eb->blocking_writers == 0) {
>               btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_put(eb);
>               btrfs_assert_tree_locked(eb);
> -             atomic_inc(&eb->blocking_writers);
> +             eb->blocking_writers++;
>               write_unlock(&eb->lock);
>       }
>  }
> @@ -148,12 +148,11 @@ void btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_write(struct 
> extent_buffer *eb)
>        */
>       if (eb->lock_nested && current->pid == eb->lock_owner)
>               return;
> -     BUG_ON(atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) != 1);
>       write_lock(&eb->lock);
> +     BUG_ON(eb->blocking_writers != 1);
>       btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_get(eb);
> -     /* atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier */
> -     if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_writers))
> -             cond_wake_up_nomb(&eb->write_lock_wq);
> +     if (--eb->blocking_writers == 0)
> +             cond_wake_up(&eb->write_lock_wq);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -167,12 +166,10 @@ void btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>       if (trace_btrfs_tree_read_lock_enabled())
>               start_ns = ktime_get_ns();
>  again:
> -     BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) &&
> -            current->pid == eb->lock_owner);
> -
>       read_lock(&eb->lock);
> -     if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) &&
> -         current->pid == eb->lock_owner) {
> +     BUG_ON(eb->blocking_writers == 0 &&
> +            current->pid == eb->lock_owner);
> +     if (eb->blocking_writers && current->pid == eb->lock_owner) {
>               /*
>                * This extent is already write-locked by our thread. We allow
>                * an additional read lock to be added because it's for the same
> @@ -185,10 +182,10 @@ void btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>               trace_btrfs_tree_read_lock(eb, start_ns);
>               return;
>       }
> -     if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) {
> +     if (eb->blocking_writers) {
>               read_unlock(&eb->lock);
>               wait_event(eb->write_lock_wq,
> -                        atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0);
> +                        eb->blocking_writers == 0);
>               goto again;
>       }
>       btrfs_assert_tree_read_locks_get(eb);
> @@ -203,11 +200,11 @@ void btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>   */
>  int btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>  {
> -     if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers))
> +     if (eb->blocking_writers)
>               return 0;
>  
>       read_lock(&eb->lock);
> -     if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) {
> +     if (eb->blocking_writers) {
>               read_unlock(&eb->lock);
>               return 0;
>       }
> @@ -223,13 +220,13 @@ int btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic(struct extent_buffer 
> *eb)
>   */
>  int btrfs_try_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>  {
> -     if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers))
> +     if (eb->blocking_writers)
>               return 0;
>  
>       if (!read_trylock(&eb->lock))
>               return 0;
>  
> -     if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) {
> +     if (eb->blocking_writers) {
>               read_unlock(&eb->lock);
>               return 0;
>       }
> @@ -245,13 +242,11 @@ int btrfs_try_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>   */
>  int btrfs_try_tree_write_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>  {
> -     if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) ||
> -         atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers))
> +     if (eb->blocking_writers || atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers))
>               return 0;
>  
>       write_lock(&eb->lock);
> -     if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) ||
> -         atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers)) {
> +     if (eb->blocking_writers || atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers)) {
>               write_unlock(&eb->lock);
>               return 0;
>       }
> @@ -322,10 +317,9 @@ void btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>       WARN_ON(eb->lock_owner == current->pid);
>  again:
>       wait_event(eb->read_lock_wq, atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0);
> -     wait_event(eb->write_lock_wq, atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0);
> +     wait_event(eb->write_lock_wq, eb->blocking_writers == 0);
>       write_lock(&eb->lock);
> -     if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) ||
> -         atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) {
> +     if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) || eb->blocking_writers) {
>               write_unlock(&eb->lock);
>               goto again;
>       }
> @@ -340,7 +334,7 @@ void btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>   */
>  void btrfs_tree_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>  {
> -     int blockers = atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers);
> +     int blockers = eb->blocking_writers;
>  
>       BUG_ON(blockers > 1);
>  
> @@ -351,7 +345,7 @@ void btrfs_tree_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>  
>       if (blockers) {
>               btrfs_assert_no_spinning_writers(eb);
> -             atomic_dec(&eb->blocking_writers);
> +             eb->blocking_writers--;
>               /* Use the lighter barrier after atomic */
>               smp_mb__after_atomic();
>               cond_wake_up_nomb(&eb->write_lock_wq);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c
> index 1141ca5fae6a..7cb4f1fbe043 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static void print_eb_refs_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>  "refs %u lock (w:%d r:%d bw:%d br:%d sw:%d sr:%d) lock_owner %u current %u",
>                  atomic_read(&eb->refs), atomic_read(&eb->write_locks),
>                  atomic_read(&eb->read_locks),
> -                atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers),
> +                eb->blocking_writers,
>                  atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers),
>                  atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers),
>                  atomic_read(&eb->spinning_readers),
> 

Reply via email to