Le 30/07/2019 à 22:15, Chris Murphy a écrit : > I sympathize with the lack of resources. But no full disk backup > simply cannot be taken seriously in any computer science context. The > data cannot be that important by the user's own estimation if there > aren't backups. It's reasonable for resource limitations to have a > subset of data backed up. But if none of it is *shrug* there just > aren't that many people who will sympathize with data loss if there > are no backups.
I do, have backups for everything, and backups of backups and offsite backups, etc. What I mean is that i.e. I have a NAS machine that acts as a backup server for all the rest of my machines. Yes the rest is also cross backed up scattered here and there. If I lose the NAS I don't lose no *unique data* Still, the exact organization of THIS machine's filesystems is unique and would be long redoing, it may hold some timeline snapshots that other storage doesn't have or doesn't have anymore etc. I can lose any of my filesystems without losing critical data. I can live and survive this way. Still, losing a given FS with subvols, snapshots etc, may be very annoying and very time consuming rebuilding. Kind regards. ॐ -- Swâmi Petaramesh <sw...@petaramesh.org> PGP 9076E32E
