On 2019/9/2 下午1:33, Qu Wenruo wrote: > [...] >>> >>> I'm curious if either 2 or 3 are permitted. >>> >>> >> >> Wish I could help, but I already deleted the file. If there's something >> I can do to move this forward, I'd be glad to. >> > > Maybe it's too late to mention, in fact "btrfs check" has the ability to > find such problem. > > "btrfs check" has two modes, original mode (the default one) and lowmem > mode. > The latter is mostly written from scratch, thus it has more strict check > rules (not to mention it uses less memory while will be much slower as > it causes more IO). > > If you're not sure if those inodes are the only offending ones, then you > can try "btrfs check --mode=lowmem --readonly" to verify. > > The support for original mode will come very soon.
Wait for a minute, that report and repair functionality is already added in v5.1 btrfs-progs. Are you using some too old btrfs-progs? THanks, Qu > > Thanks, > Qu >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
