On Wed, Sep 25, 2019, at 10:56 AM, Chris Mason wrote: > The data is verified while being decompressed, but that's a fairly large > fuzzing surface (all of zstd, zlib, and lzo). A lot of people will > correctly argue that we already have that fuzzing surface today, but I'd > rather not make a really easy way to stuff arbitrary bytes through the > kernel decompression code until all the projects involved sign off. Right. So maybe have this start of as a BTRFS ioctl and require privileges? I assume that's sufficient for what Omar wants. (Are there actually any other popular Linux filesystems that do transparent compression anyways?)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED for writing comp... Jens Axboe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED for writing comp... Omar Sandoval
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED for writing... Omar Sandoval
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED for wri... Jann Horn
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED for... Christian Brauner
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED... Matthew Wilcox
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED for... Omar Sandoval
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED for... Dave Chinner
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED... Colin Walters
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] add RWF_ENCODED for... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] add RWF_ENCODED for... Colin Walters
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] add RWF_ENCODED for... Omar Sandoval
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED... Dave Chinner
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED... Omar Sandoval