On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:46:56AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 01:59:37PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 05:13:21PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 12:28:13PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > This patchset contains only the btrfs part of the following patchset. > > > > > > > > [1] [PATCHSET v2 btrfs/for-next] blkcg, btrfs: fix cgroup writeback > > > > support > > > > > > > > The block part has already been applied to > > > > > > > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/ > > > > for-linus > > > > > > > > with some naming changes. This patchset has been updated accordingly. > > > > > > I'm going to add this patchset to for-next to get some testing coverage, > > > there are some comments pending, but that are changelog updates and > > > refactoring. > > > > No updates, so patchset stays in for-next, closest merge target is 5.5. > > Sorry about dropping the ball. It looked like Chris and Nikolay > weren't agreeing so I wasn't sure what the next step should be and > then forgot about it. The following is the discussion. > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c2419d01-5c84-3fb4-189e-4db519d08...@suse.com/ > > What do you think about the exchange?
I've read the thread again and talked to Nikolay. After going through the questions raised for patch 3/5, I'm more or less ok with merging it as there are no blockers. I'll update the changelogs with points from the discussion. The patchset has been in for-next for some months now so we have testing coverage but we'll have more in the main devel patch queue, that I'll add after I do one more review pass.
