On 1/23/21 4:27 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 01:41:52PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: >> IORING_OP_GETDENTS64 behaves like getdents64(2) and takes the same > > Could we drop the '64'? We don't, for example, have IOURING_OP_FADVISE64 > even though that's the name of the syscall.
Agreed, only case we do mimic the names are for things like IORING_OP_OPENAT2 where it does carry meaning. For this one, it should just be IORING_OP_GETDENTS. -- Jens Axboe
