On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:28:23AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > All of our normal flushing is asynchronous reclaim, so this helper is > poorly named. This is more checking if we need to preemptively flush > space, so rename it to need_preemptive_reclaim. > > Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c > index 0f84bee57c29..f37ead28bd05 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c > @@ -799,9 +799,9 @@ btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size(struct btrfs_fs_info > *fs_info, > return to_reclaim; > } > > -static inline int need_do_async_reclaim(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, > - struct btrfs_space_info *space_info, > - u64 used) > +static inline bool need_preemptive_reclaim(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
Following patches add more code to that function so it's not really suitable for 'static inline', I'd rather drop it.
