Fixed a coding style issue in thresh_exec_hook()

Signed-off-by: Maheep Kumar Kathuria <m...@maheepk.net>
---
 fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
index 309516e6a968..38abeff7af69 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -212,9 +212,8 @@ static inline void thresh_exec_hook(struct 
__btrfs_workqueue *wq)
 out:
        spin_unlock(&wq->thres_lock);
 
-       if (need_change) {
+       if (need_change)
                workqueue_set_max_active(wq->normal_wq, wq->current_active);
-       }
 }
 
 static void run_ordered_work(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq,
-- 
2.29.2

Reply via email to