Fixed a coding style issue in thresh_exec_hook() Signed-off-by: Maheep Kumar Kathuria <m...@maheepk.net> --- fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c index 309516e6a968..38abeff7af69 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c @@ -212,9 +212,8 @@ static inline void thresh_exec_hook(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq) out: spin_unlock(&wq->thres_lock); - if (need_change) { + if (need_change) workqueue_set_max_active(wq->normal_wq, wq->current_active); - } } static void run_ordered_work(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq, -- 2.29.2