On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 04:26:05PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> I noticed we don't run fsstress with fscrypt in any of our tests, and
> this was helpful in uncovering a couple of symlink related corner cases
> for the btrfs support work.  Add a basic test that creates a encrypted
> directory and runs fsstress in that directory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
>  tests/generic/736     | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/generic/736.out |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tests/generic/736
>  create mode 100644 tests/generic/736.out

This might be worth adding, but the way this sort of thing is tested on other
filesystems is through implementing the test_dummy_encryption mount option and
then doing a full run of xfstests with test_dummy_encryption enabled.  That's
more comprehensive than just running fsstress.

- Eric

Reply via email to