On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 03:02:32PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 04:40:15PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This is the next version of the fscrypt support. It is based on a > > combination > > of Sterba's for-next branch and the fscrypt for-next branch. The fscrypt > > stuff > > should apply cleanly to the fscrypt for-next, but it won't apply cleanly to > > our > > btrfs for-next branch. I did this in case Eric wants to go ahead and merge > > the > > fscrypt side, then we can figure out what to do on the btrfs side. > > > > v1 was posted here > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1695750478.git.jo...@toxicpanda.com/ > > Hi Josef! Are you planning to send out an updated version of this soon? >
Hey Eric, Yup I meant to have another one out the door a couple of weeks ago but I was going through your fstests comments and learned about -o test_dummy_encryption so I implemented that and a few problems fell out, and then I was at Plumbers and Maintainers Summit. I'm working through my mount api changes now and the encryption thing is next, I hope to get it out today as I fixed most of the problems, I just have to fix one of our IOCTL's that exposes file names that wasn't decrypting the names and then hopefully it'll be good. FWIW all the things I had to fix didn't require changes to the fscrypt side, so it's mostly untouched since last time. Thanks, Josef
