On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:44:33 -0500
Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com> wrote:
> cxl_test provides a good way to ensure quick smoke and regression
> testing. The complexity of Dynamic Capacity (DC) extent processing as
> well as the complexity of the new sparse DAX regions can mostly be
> tested through cxl_test. This includes management of sparse regions and
> DAX devices on those regions; the management of extent device lifetimes;
> and the processing of DCD events.
>
> The only missing functionality from this test is actual interrupt
> processing.
>
> Mock memory devices can easily mock DC information and manage fake
> extent data.
>
> Define mock_dc_region information within the mock memory data. Add
> sysfs entries on the mock device to inject and delete extents.
>
> The inject format is <start>:<length>:<tag>:<more_flag>
> The delete format is <start>:<length>
>
> Directly call the event irq callback to simulate irqs to process the
> test extents.
>
> Add DC mailbox commands to the CEL and implement those commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com>
Minor stuff inline.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> +static int mock_get_dc_config(struct device *dev,
> + struct cxl_mbox_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> + struct cxl_mbox_get_dc_config_in *dc_config = cmd->payload_in;
> + struct cxl_mockmem_data *mdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + u8 region_requested, region_start_idx, region_ret_cnt;
> + struct cxl_mbox_get_dc_config_out *resp;
> + int i;
> +
> + region_requested = dc_config->region_count;
> + if (region_requested > NUM_MOCK_DC_REGIONS)
> + region_requested = NUM_MOCK_DC_REGIONS;
region_requested = min(...)
> +
> + if (cmd->size_out < struct_size(resp, region, region_requested))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + memset(cmd->payload_out, 0, cmd->size_out);
> + resp = cmd->payload_out;
> +
> + region_start_idx = dc_config->start_region_index;
> + region_ret_cnt = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_MOCK_DC_REGIONS; i++) {
> + if (i >= region_start_idx) {
> + memcpy(&resp->region[region_ret_cnt],
> + &mdata->dc_regions[i],
> + sizeof(resp->region[region_ret_cnt]));
> + region_ret_cnt++;
> + }
> + }
> + resp->avail_region_count = NUM_MOCK_DC_REGIONS;
> + resp->regions_returned = i;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Returning %d dc regions\n", region_ret_cnt);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static void cxl_mock_mem_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct cxl_mockmem_data *mdata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> + struct cxl_memdev_state *mds = mdata->mds;
> +
> + dev_dbg(mds->cxlds.dev, "Removing extents\n");
Clean this up as it doesn't do anything!
> +}
> +
> @@ -1689,14 +2142,261 @@ static ssize_t sanitize_timeout_store(struct device
> *dev,
>
> return count;
> }
> -
Grump ;) No whitespace changes in a patch doing anything 'useful'.
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(sanitize_timeout);
>
> +static int log_dc_event(struct cxl_mockmem_data *mdata, enum dc_event type,
> + u64 start, u64 length, const char *tag_str, bool more)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = mdata->mds->cxlds.dev;
> + struct cxl_test_dcd *dcd_event;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "mock device log event %d\n", type);
> +
> + dcd_event = devm_kmemdup(dev, &dcd_event_rec_template,
> + sizeof(*dcd_event), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dcd_event)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + dcd_event->rec.flags = 0;
> + if (more)
> + dcd_event->rec.flags |= CXL_DCD_EVENT_MORE;
> + dcd_event->rec.event_type = type;
> + dcd_event->rec.extent.start_dpa = cpu_to_le64(start);
> + dcd_event->rec.extent.length = cpu_to_le64(length);
> + memcpy(dcd_event->rec.extent.tag, tag_str,
> + min(sizeof(dcd_event->rec.extent.tag),
> + strlen(tag_str)));
> +
> + mes_add_event(mdata, CXL_EVENT_TYPE_DCD,
> + (struct cxl_event_record_raw *)dcd_event);
I guess this is where the missing event in previous patch come from.
Increment the number here, not back in that patch.
Jonathan
