On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 01:48:07PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Now, maybe we should put this optimisation into the definition of nth_page?

Sounds like a good idea to me.

> > > +struct folio {
> > > + /* private: don't document the anon union */
> > > + union {
> > > +         struct {
> > > + /* public: */
> > > +                 unsigned long flags;
> > > +                 struct list_head lru;
> > > +                 struct address_space *mapping;
> > > +                 pgoff_t index;
> > > +                 unsigned long private;
> > > +                 atomic_t _mapcount;
> > > +                 atomic_t _refcount;
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> > > +                 unsigned long memcg_data;
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > As Christoph, I'm not a fan of this :/
> 
> What would you prefer?

I liked earlier approach with only struct page here. Once we know a field
should never be referenced from raw struct page, we can move it here.

But feel free to ignore my suggestion. It's not show-stopper for me and
reverting is back doesn't worth it.

I went through the patchset and it looks good. You can use my

  Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>

on all of them.

Thanks a lot for doing this.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs

Reply via email to