Hi folks, David Howells wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 03:09:39PM +0100: > > Does this change require any of the earlier patches in the series? If > > not, then it may be good to go ahead and merge this conversion > > separately, ahead of the rest of the series. > > There's a conflict with patch 1 - you can see the same changes made to afs and > ceph there, but apart from that, no. However, I can't do patch 6 without it > being applied first. If Dominique or one of the other 9p people can get Linus > to apply it now, that would be great, but I think that unlikely since the > merge window has passed.
Agreed with the merge window passed it'll be for next one -- but I'd like this to sit in -next for as long as possible, so I'd appreciate either being able to carry the patch in my tree (difficult as then you'll need to base yourself on mine) or you putting it in there somehow after I've got the most basic tests verified again (do you have a branch pulled for linux-next?) I'll try to get tests done in the next few days and check my notes for things that were missing in the earlier version you gave me in the past.. Sorry for not doing it myself, you're of great help. -- Dominique -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
