On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 23:24 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Implement a function to encode a binary cookie key as something that can be
> used as a filename.  Four options are considered:
> 
>  (1) All printable chars with no '/' characters.  Prepend a 'D' to indicate
>      the encoding but otherwise use as-is.
> 
>  (2) Appears to be an array of __be32.  Encode as 'S' plus a list of
>      hex-encoded 32-bit ints separated by commas.  If a number is 0, it is
>      rendered as "" instead of "0".
> 
>  (3) Appears to be an array of __le32.  Encoded as (2) but with a 'T'
>      encoding prefix.
> 
>  (4) Encoded as base64 with an 'E' prefix plus a second char indicating how
>      much padding is involved.  A non-standard base64 encoding is used
>      because '/' cannot be used in the encoded form.
> 
> If (1) is not possible, whichever of (2), (3) or (4) produces the shortest
> string is selected (hex-encoding a number may be less dense than base64
> encoding it).
> 

Since most cookies are fairly small, is there any real benefit to
optimizing for length here? How much inflation are we talking about?

> Note that the prefix characters have to be selected from the set [DEIJST@]
> lest cachefilesd remove the files because it recognise the name.
> 
> Changes
> =======
> ver #2:
>  - Fix a short allocation that didn't allow for a string terminator[1]
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
> cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/bcefb8f2-576a-b3fc-cc29-89808ebfd...@linux.alibaba.com/
>  [1]
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/163819640393.215744.15212364106412961104.st...@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
>  # v1
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/163906940529.143852.17352132319136117053.st...@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
>  # v2
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/163967149827.1823006.6088580775428487961.st...@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
>  # v3
> ---
> 
>  fs/cachefiles/Makefile   |    1 
>  fs/cachefiles/internal.h |    5 ++
>  fs/cachefiles/key.c      |  138 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 144 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 fs/cachefiles/key.c
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/Makefile b/fs/cachefiles/Makefile
> index d67210ece9cd..6f025940a65c 100644
> --- a/fs/cachefiles/Makefile
> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/Makefile
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ cachefiles-y := \
>       cache.o \
>       daemon.o \
>       interface.o \
> +     key.o \
>       main.o \
>       namei.o \
>       security.o \
> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
> index 8763ee4a0df2..dbc37f5d4714 100644
> --- a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
> @@ -173,6 +173,11 @@ extern struct cachefiles_object 
> *cachefiles_grab_object(struct cachefiles_object
>  extern void cachefiles_put_object(struct cachefiles_object *object,
>                                 enum cachefiles_obj_ref_trace why);
>  
> +/*
> + * key.c
> + */
> +extern bool cachefiles_cook_key(struct cachefiles_object *object);
> +
>  /*
>   * main.c
>   */
> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/key.c b/fs/cachefiles/key.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bf935e25bdbe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/key.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/* Key to pathname encoder
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> + * Written by David Howells (dhowe...@redhat.com)
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include "internal.h"
> +
> +static const char cachefiles_charmap[64] =
> +     "0123456789"                    /* 0 - 9 */
> +     "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"    /* 10 - 35 */
> +     "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ"    /* 36 - 61 */
> +     "_-"                            /* 62 - 63 */
> +     ;
> +
> +static const char cachefiles_filecharmap[256] = {
> +     /* we skip space and tab and control chars */
> +     [33 ... 46] = 1,                /* '!' -> '.' */
> +     /* we skip '/' as it's significant to pathwalk */
> +     [48 ... 127] = 1,               /* '0' -> '~' */
> +};
> +
> +static inline unsigned int how_many_hex_digits(unsigned int x)
> +{
> +     return x ? round_up(ilog2(x) + 1, 4) / 4 : 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * turn the raw key into something cooked
> + * - the key may be up to NAME_MAX in length (including the length word)
> + *   - "base64" encode the strange keys, mapping 3 bytes of raw to four of
> + *     cooked
> + *   - need to cut the cooked key into 252 char lengths (189 raw bytes)
> + */
> +bool cachefiles_cook_key(struct cachefiles_object *object)
> +{
> +     const u8 *key = fscache_get_key(object->cookie), *kend;
> +     unsigned char ch;
> +     unsigned int acc, i, n, nle, nbe, keylen = object->cookie->key_len;
> +     unsigned int b64len, len, print, pad;
> +     char *name, sep;
> +
> +     _enter(",%u,%*phN", keylen, keylen, key);
> +
> +     BUG_ON(keylen > NAME_MAX - 3);
> +
> +     print = 1;
> +     for (i = 0; i < keylen; i++) {
> +             ch = key[i];
> +             print &= cachefiles_filecharmap[ch];
> +     }
> +
> +     /* If the path is usable ASCII, then we render it directly */
> +     if (print) {
> +             len = 1 + keylen;
> +             name = kmalloc(len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> +             if (!name)
> +                     return false;
> +
> +             name[0] = 'D'; /* Data object type, string encoding */
> +             memcpy(name + 1, key, keylen);
> +             goto success;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* See if it makes sense to encode it as "hex,hex,hex" for each 32-bit
> +      * chunk.  We rely on the key having been padded out to a whole number
> +      * of 32-bit words.
> +      */
> +     n = round_up(keylen, 4);
> +     nbe = nle = 0;
> +     for (i = 0; i < n; i += 4) {
> +             u32 be = be32_to_cpu(*(__be32 *)(key + i));
> +             u32 le = le32_to_cpu(*(__le32 *)(key + i));
> +
> +             nbe += 1 + how_many_hex_digits(be);
> +             nle += 1 + how_many_hex_digits(le);
> +     }
> +
> +     b64len = DIV_ROUND_UP(keylen, 3);
> +     pad = b64len * 3 - keylen;
> +     b64len = 2 + b64len * 4; /* Length if we base64-encode it */
> +     _debug("len=%u nbe=%u nle=%u b64=%u", keylen, nbe, nle, b64len);
> +     if (nbe < b64len || nle < b64len) {
> +             unsigned int nlen = min(nbe, nle) + 1;
> +             name = kmalloc(nlen, GFP_KERNEL);
> +             if (!name)
> +                     return false;
> +             sep = (nbe <= nle) ? 'S' : 'T'; /* Encoding indicator */
> +             len = 0;
> +             for (i = 0; i < n; i += 4) {
> +                     u32 x;
> +                     if (nbe <= nle)
> +                             x = be32_to_cpu(*(__be32 *)(key + i));
> +                     else
> +                             x = le32_to_cpu(*(__le32 *)(key + i));
> +                     name[len++] = sep;
> +                     if (x != 0)
> +                             len += snprintf(name + len, nlen - len, "%x", 
> x);
> +                     sep = ',';
> +             }
> +             goto success;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* We need to base64-encode it */
> +     name = kmalloc(b64len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!name)
> +             return false;
> +
> +     name[0] = 'E';
> +     name[1] = '0' + pad;
> +     len = 2;
> +     kend = key + keylen;
> +     do {
> +             acc  = *key++;
> +             if (key < kend) {
> +                     acc |= *key++ << 8;
> +                     if (key < kend)
> +                             acc |= *key++ << 16;
> +             }
> +
> +             name[len++] = cachefiles_charmap[acc & 63];
> +             acc >>= 6;
> +             name[len++] = cachefiles_charmap[acc & 63];
> +             acc >>= 6;
> +             name[len++] = cachefiles_charmap[acc & 63];
> +             acc >>= 6;
> +             name[len++] = cachefiles_charmap[acc & 63];
> +     } while (key < kend);

It might be good to eventually consolidate this code with the base64
scheme that fscrypt uses. Are they compatible? If so, then that can be
done in a later merge.

> +
> +success:
> +     name[len] = 0;
> +     object->d_name = name;
> +     object->d_name_len = len;
> +     _leave(" = %s", object->d_name);
> +     return true;
> +}
> 
> 

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlay...@kernel.org>

--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs

Reply via email to