On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:32:22AM +0800, Yue Hu wrote:
> After waiting for the volume to complete the acquisition with timeout,
> the if condition under which potential volume collision occurs should be
> acquire the volume is still pending rather than not pending so that we
> will continue to wait until the pending flag is cleared. Also, use the
> existing test pending wrapper directly instead of test_bit().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huy...@coolpad.com>
> ---

Looks good to me,

Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiang...@linux.alibaba.com>

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

>  fs/fscache/volume.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fscache/volume.c b/fs/fscache/volume.c
> index 71d3a6d6d72c..f2009cc22002 100644
> --- a/fs/fscache/volume.c
> +++ b/fs/fscache/volume.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void fscache_wait_on_volume_collision(struct 
> fscache_volume *candidate,
>  {
>       wait_var_event_timeout(&candidate->flags,
>                              !fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate), 20 * HZ);
> -     if (!fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate)) {
> +     if (fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate)) {
>               pr_notice("Potential volume collision new=%08x old=%08x",
>                         candidate->debug_id, collidee_debug_id);
>               fscache_stat(&fscache_n_volumes_collision);
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static bool fscache_hash_volume(struct fscache_volume 
> *candidate)
>       hlist_bl_add_head(&candidate->hash_link, h);
>       hlist_bl_unlock(h);
>  
> -     if (test_bit(FSCACHE_VOLUME_ACQUIRE_PENDING, &candidate->flags))
> +     if (fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate))
>               fscache_wait_on_volume_collision(candidate, collidee_debug_id);
>       return true;
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> --
> Linux-cachefs mailing list
> Linux-cachefs@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs

--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs

Reply via email to