On 7/5/22 10:22 AM, xiu...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Xiubo Li <xiu...@redhat.com>

And also the comment said it will drop the folio references but
the code was increasing it.

Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiu...@redhat.com>
---
  fs/netfs/buffered_read.c | 3 ---
  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
index 5b93e22397fe..a44a5b3b8d4c 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
@@ -396,9 +396,6 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
         */
        ractl._nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
        netfs_rreq_expand(rreq, &ractl);
-
-       /* We hold the folio locks, so we can drop the references */
-       folio_get(folio);
        while (readahead_folio(&ractl))
                ;

Will drop this patch, the above fix it incorrect.

Thanks!

--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs

Reply via email to