David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> wrote: > What two values are you ordering? > > If we're using this to create a critical section, then yes, we would need a > barrier to order the changes inside the critical section before changing the > memory location that forms the lock - but this is not a critical section.
Actually, that said, the ordering is probably between the bit being cleared and the task state. David -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
