Also,
Op 8-12-2010 18:28, Shirish Pargaonkar schreef:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Shirish Pargaonkar
>>>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/sess.c b/fs/cifs/sess.c
>>>> index 7b01d3f..122ad31 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/cifs/sess.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/cifs/sess.c
>>>> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static void build_ntlmssp_negotiate_blob(unsigned char
>>>> *pbuffer,
(...)
>>>> @@ -544,8 +544,9 @@ static int build_ntlmssp_auth_blob(unsigned char
>>>> *pbuffer,
The patch you sent me (and which I tested successfully) had an extra
hunk in it:
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int build_ntlmssp_auth_blob(unsigned char
*pbuffer,
flags = NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_56 |
NTLMSSP_REQUEST_TARGET | NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_TARGET_INFO |
NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_128 | NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_UNICODE |
- NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM;
+ NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM | NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_EXTENDED_SEC;
if (ses->server->secMode &
(SECMODE_SIGN_REQUIRED | SECMODE_SIGN_ENABLED))
flags |= NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN;
Is it your intent to leave out this hunk?
Regards,
Robbert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
