On Wed,  6 Apr 2011 08:46:06 -0500
[email protected] wrote:

> From: Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> Fix authentication failures using extended security mechanisms.
> cifs client does not take into consideration extended security bit
> in capabilities field in negotiate protocol response from the server.
> 
> Please refer to Samba bugzilla 8046.
> 
> 
> Reported-and-tested by: Werner Maes <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/cifssmb.c |   17 ++++++-----------
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
> index 3291770..e119d70 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
> @@ -570,18 +570,10 @@ CIFSSMBNegotiate(unsigned int xid, struct cifs_ses *ses)
>       if (pSMBr->EncryptionKeyLength == CIFS_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE) {
>               memcpy(ses->server->cryptkey, pSMBr->u.EncryptionKey,
>                      CIFS_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE);
> -     } else if ((pSMBr->hdr.Flags2 & SMBFLG2_EXT_SEC)
> -                     && (pSMBr->EncryptionKeyLength == 0)) {
> +     } else if ((pSMBr->hdr.Flags2 & SMBFLG2_EXT_SEC ||
> +                     server->capabilities & CAP_EXTENDED_SECURITY) &&
> +                             (pSMBr->EncryptionKeyLength == 0)) {
>               /* decode security blob */

This looks wrong to me. CAP_EXTENDED_SECURITY just means that the
server supports extended security, not that it's in use, right? Aren't
we just working around server brokenness here. Why isn't it setting
SMBFLG2_EXT_SEC if it's using extended security?

Are there cases where the server might set EncryptionKeyLength to 0,
and *not* be using extended security? If not, then why bother to check
the flags or capabilities at all?

> -     } else if (server->sec_mode & SECMODE_PW_ENCRYPT) {
> -             rc = -EIO; /* no crypt key only if plain text pwd */
> -             goto neg_err_exit;
> -     }
> -
> -     /* BB might be helpful to save off the domain of server here */
> -
> -     if ((pSMBr->hdr.Flags2 & SMBFLG2_EXT_SEC) &&
> -             (server->capabilities & CAP_EXTENDED_SECURITY)) {
>               count = get_bcc(&pSMBr->hdr);
>               if (count < 16) {
>                       rc = -EIO;
> @@ -624,6 +616,9 @@ CIFSSMBNegotiate(unsigned int xid, struct cifs_ses *ses)
>                       } else
>                                       rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>               }
> +     } else if (server->sec_mode & SECMODE_PW_ENCRYPT) {
> +             rc = -EIO; /* no crypt key only if plain text pwd */
> +             goto neg_err_exit;
>       } else
>               server->capabilities &= ~CAP_EXTENDED_SECURITY;
>  


-- 
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to