Would you respin to add the reviewed-by (and any more you got) and fix
the comment

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:59:03 +0200
> Gerlando Falauto <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Automounting directories are now invalidated by .d_revalidate()
>> so to be d_instantiate()d again with the right DCACHE_NEED_AUTOMOUNT
>> flag
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  fs/cifs/dir.c |    7 ++++++-
>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/dir.c b/fs/cifs/dir.c
>> index 9ea65cf..67f54d3 100644
>> --- a/fs/cifs/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/cifs/dir.c
>> @@ -637,8 +637,13 @@ cifs_d_revalidate(struct dentry *direntry, struct 
>> nameidata *nd)
>>       if (direntry->d_inode) {
>>               if (cifs_revalidate_dentry(direntry))
>>                       return 0;
>> -             else
>> +             else {
>> +                     /* We want automonting inodes to be
>> +                      * considered invalid or so */
>
> The comment is a little unclear. A better comment might be -- "Forcibly
> invalidate automounting inodes", or something along those lines...
>
>> +                     if (IS_AUTOMOUNT(direntry->d_inode))
>> +                             return 0;
>>                       return 1;
>> +             }
>>       }
>>
>>       /*
>
> The patch itself looks reasonable though...
>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to