On 14/11/2011 02:17, Jeff Layton wrote:
We've had a request recently to allow cifs.upcall to use AD-style
service principals. While trying to nail down what they need, I asked
Simo his opinion on how best to pick a service principal for a given
hostname. His suggestion was:
INPUT: fooo
TRY in order:
FOOO$@REALM
cifs/fooo.<guessed domain ?>@REALM
host/fooo.<guessed domain ?>@REALM
INPUT: bar.example.com
TRY in order:
cifs/bar.example.com@REALM
BAR$@REALM
host/bar.example.com@REALM
This patchset attempts to embody that logic.
Suggestions welcome. Those reviewing it, please pay particular attention
to the scheme for guessing a domain name. I want to make certain that
we're not opening up any security holes with that scheme.
Jeff, you have to pay attention to DFS volumes.
IE. if I want to mount //mydomain.corp/sysvol you will never get a
ticket for cifs/mydomain.corp@REALM instead you need to locate with
trans2 calls (for smb1, I don't remember the name for smb2) the domain
controlers (DC) that could provide you the share.
For sysvol it's still quite simple but you can have other DFS volume
that are not stored on DC, would be great to have DFS awareness in the
cifs client.
Matthieu
--
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team
http://samba.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
