On Wed, 16 May 2012 13:57:34 +0400
Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/file.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> index 9c2d85d..ed9b5a8 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -1357,8 +1357,8 @@ cifs_setlk(struct file *file,  struct file_lock *flock, 
> __u32 type,
>               if (rc <= 0)
>                       goto out;
>  
> -             rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, current->tgid, length,
> -                              flock->fl_start, 0, 1, type, wait_flag, 0);
> +             rc = cifs_mandatory_lock(xid, cfile, flock->fl_start, length,
> +                                      type, 1, 0, wait_flag);
>               if (rc) {
>                       kfree(lock);
>                       goto out;

You can probably roll this in with patch #4 since it's a very similar
change and so small...

Looks fine though. I guess at some point you'll need to add a
ops->mandatory_lock or something?

-- 
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to