Entered a bug.Bugzilla Bug 250811<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250811>: clustat report wrong information about rgmanager on a GULM clusterHope it will be solved soon, which can save some work of mine, since I can not trust/rely on clustat right now.
Thanks, Siman On 8/2/07, Lon Hohberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:22:33AM -0400, siman hew wrote: > > I found clustat report wrong information about rgmanager when a cluster > is > > GULM. > > I setup a 3-node cluster on RHEL4U5, with GULM. There are one failover > > domain, one resource and one service, just for testing. > > I found clustat always report rgmanger is running after cluster is > started. > > With the configuration with DLM, clustat report correctly. > > node4 is lock server, and all nodes report the same inaccurate > information. > > GULM doesn't have a way to provide sub-groups really, except for users > of lockspaces. > > Can you file a bugzilla about this? I wonder if we can get the > information for "what nodes are in this lockspace" from GULM. If it's > possible, we could probably fix it. > > -- > Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc. > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
