Great! I can do both. Can someone explain to me just for clarification purposes why I would define a resource? What does it do?
--- Chris Edwards From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Lyon Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:09 PM To: linux clustering Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS as a service Ok, so which is better for a Red Hat cluster? I prefer to do both. Since they are GFS I want them mounted on all nodes at boot. So the entries are in /etc/fstab and /etc/init.d/gfs is enabled. Then I configure the gfs resources and do not enable the force unmount. So the cluster will mount the file system when needed, if for some reason it was not mounted. And it will leave the file system as is when the service switches to another node. -Jeremy
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
