Hi
We have executed some benchs on gfs2, gfs compared to ext3 and ocfs2
and the results are (just some examples):
* Read on 1 file :
quite the same performance
* Write on 1 file :
quite the same performance
* Creation of many many files and repertories :
gfs2 is 10 times less good than ext3 and ocfs2
* Write of a file tree followed by 4 reading process :
gfs and gfs2 : 40 mn
ocfs2 : 3 mn
Does it seem normal for you ? or is there some hidden tuning somewhere
to increase
performances when using gfs2 (or gfs) ?
Thanks a lot.
Regards.
Alain
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
