Thank you Ian, I´l take your answer in account, Greetings,
ESG 2009/6/8 Ian Hayes <[email protected]> > You don't need a third node or quorum disk... A 2-node cluster is sort of a > special case, which is why there is a special config line for a setup with > only 2 nodes. I'm running a couple of 2-node clusters right now with no > quorum disk. The main issue I've encountered is that they can go split-brain > easily, and you get to watch both nodes fence each other off endlessly. > Adding clean_start="1" to the fence_daemon line helps prevent this, but a > quorum disk would be better if you're absolutely committed to a 2-node > setup. > > I'm running a test cluster at this moment with 3 nodes and a 1Gb quorum > partition that is shared out via iSCSI. I sort of discovered that I needed a > quorum disk the hard way after taking 2 nodes down and the suriviving node > gave up due to the cluster being inquorate. > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:22 AM, ESGLinux <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> I have one existential question about two nodes cluster. I have read that >> for 2 nodes cluster is necessary a third element to give stabilty to the >> cluster. >> >> One way is to add a third node, so its not a 2 nodes cluster. For me its >> not an answer because It becomes another kind of cluster ( 3 nodes cluster) >> >> Other, is to use qdisk (this is the way I´m trying nowadays) >> >> My question is if it´s absollutely necesary this third element in the >> architecture. and If so which are the options, ? >> >> thanks in advance >> >> ESG >> >> >> -- >> Linux-cluster mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >> > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
