* * On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Send Linux-cluster mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Linux-cluster digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. GFS2 versus ext3/4 (Devrim G?ND?Z) > 2. Re: GFS2 versus ext3/4 (Fajar A. Nugraha) > 3. Re: GFS2 versus ext3/4 (Devrim G?ND?Z) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:46:10 +0300 > From: Devrim G?ND?Z <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Linux-cluster] GFS2 versus ext3/4 > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > Are there any downsides of using ext3/4 on a shared-storage setup with > active/passive cluster? > > I'm working on a new PostgreSQL clustering setup, and I'm hardly > convinced that GFS2 will have more protection against ext3/4. > > -- of course, I'm assuming that I'm fencing both nodes properly, so that > their connection with storage is cut off when needed. > > Regards, > -- > Devrim G?ND?Z > Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > PostgreSQL Dan??man?/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer > Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr > http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 198 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part > URL: < > https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/f489d129/attachment.bin > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:15:10 +0700 > From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> > To: linux clustering <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS2 versus ext3/4 > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > 2011/4/25 Devrim G?ND?Z <[email protected]> > > > > > Are there any downsides of using ext3/4 on a shared-storage setup with > > active/passive cluster? > > > > > If you're sure that only one node can mount it, using ext3/4 gives more > performance compared to gfs(2). > > -- > FAN > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/2094f4f0/attachment.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:42:32 +0300 > From: Devrim G?ND?Z <[email protected]> > To: linux clustering <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS2 versus ext3/4 > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 13:15 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > > > > If you're sure that only one node can mount it, using ext3/4 gives > > more performance compared to gfs(2). > > There is no 100% guarantee for it, but of course, it might be worth > trying then. > > Regards, > -- > Devrim G?ND?Z > Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > PostgreSQL Dan??man?/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer > Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr > http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 198 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part > URL: < > https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/5228a419/attachment.bin > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > End of Linux-cluster Digest, Vol 84, Issue 29 > ********************************************* > -- Regards, Prince Chauhan (mob:- 09467206219) HCL Infosystem Ltd. CHANDIGARH E-mail:- [email protected] www.hclinfosystems.in www.hcl.com *Technology that touches lives** **TM***** *[image: cid:[email protected]]*
<<image001.jpg>>
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
