Hadn't to...for example look at the scenario where there is a separation between the heartbeat/fencing network, and the application/public network.
In this case it's seems logical to me that clusternode name should point to private names (ie, call them "nodexxx-hb" or "nodexxx-private" , etc. Unrelated to the public hostnames and on different IP networks. alvaro >Somewhere along the way, I got the idea that <clunsternode name="..."> >had to match 'uname -n'. Am I mad, or is this in fact the case? If it is >the case, why? >I hate saying "this must be so" without understanding the mechanics of >why. If I am wrong, then I need a boot to the head. :P -- -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
