On 5/16/2012 7:02 PM, Randy Zagar wrote: > Are you sure that nfslock="1" is a valid option for "<fs ...>"?
Yes. > > There doesn't appear to be a way to add that through LUCI, which means > I'll have to make and propagate those changes manually. I used to do > this in EL5 > > /sbin/ccs_tool update /etc/cluster/cluster.conf > > but it looks like it's handled differently now. I don´t know how to do that in Luci. All my work is done via manual editing. Fabio > > How? > > -RZ > > On 05/16/2012 11:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> On 05/15/2012 07:33 PM, Randy Zagar wrote: >>> > <resources> >>> > <ip address="192.168.1.1" monitor_link="1"/> >>> > <ip address="192.168.1.2" monitor_link="1"/> >>> > <ip address="192.168.1.3" monitor_link="1"/> >>> > <fs device="/dev/cvg00/volume01" force_fsck="0" >>> > force_unmount="1" fsid="49388" fstype="ext3" mountpoint="/lvm/volume01" >>> > name="volume01" self_fence="0"/> >>> > <fs device="/dev/cvg00/volume02" force_fsck="0" >>> > force_unmount="1" fsid="58665" fstype="ext3" mountpoint="/lvm/volume01" >>> > name="volume01" self_fence="0"/> >>> > <fs device="/dev/cvg00/volume03" force_fsck="0" >>> > force_unmount="1" fsid="61028" fstype="ext3" mountpoint="/lvm/volume01" >>> > name="volume01" self_fence="0"/> >>> > <nfsclient allow_recover="1" name="local-subnet" >>> > options="rw,insecure" target="192.168.1.0/24"/> >>> > </resources> >> For the <fs resources you want nfslock="1" option too. >> >>> > <service autostart="1" domain="nfs1-domain" exclusive="0" >>> > name="nfs1" nfslock="1" recovery="relocate"> >>> > <ip ref="192.168.1.1"> >>> > <fs __independent_subtree="1" >>> > ref="volume01"> >>> > <nfsexport name="nfs-volume01"> >>> > <nfsclient name=" " >>> > ref="local-subnet"/> >>> > </nfsexport> >>> > </fs> >>> > </ip> >> For all services you need to change the order. >> >> <fs.. >> <nfsexport.. >> <nfsclient.. >> <ip.. >> </nfsclient.. >> </nfsexport.. >> </fs >> >> This solves different issues at startup, relocation and recovery >> >> Also note that there is known limitation in nfsd (both rhel5/6) that >> could cause some problems in some conditions in your current >> configuration. A permanent fix is being worked on atm. >> >> Without extreme details, you might have 2 of those services running on >> the same node and attempting to relocate one of them can fail because >> the fs cannot be unmounted. This is due to nfsd holding a lock (at >> kernel level) to the FS. Changing config to the suggested one, mask the >> problem pretty well, but more testing for a real fix is in progress. >> >> Fabio > > -- > Randy Zagar Sr. Unix Systems Administrator > E-mail: [email protected] Applied Research Laboratories > Phone: 512 835-3131 Univ. of Texas at Austin > > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
