On 06/09/12 15:11 +0000, Chip Burke wrote: > Well that was an easy enough fix finally. I thought perhaps the password > for the VMWare fence account was the issue and updated cluster.conf with a > place holder password of 'password'. Ricci would not work. So I updated > the actual ricci user account to use a password of 'password' and > restarted Ricci on all of the nodes. Ricci now works. So indeed, it > certainly did not like a character in the password I was using which was > 65peC&E$taFRE&U. In all likelihood the & was the problem character.
Bull's eye. > On 9/6/12 6:11 AM, "Jan Pokorný" <jpoko...@redhat.com> wrote: >> The easiest explanation is that this XML is not well-formed, which >> would boil down to your obfuscated password (not offending it, >> it's highly reasonable). Did you password contain any XML-nonfriendly >> character, such as one of '<>"&'? If so, could you please try digits, >> ASCII letters and surely-safe characters only (dot, dash, etc.)? Admittedly, this obstacle should be easier to track down, if allowed to exist at all (see bellow). > To confirm that hypothesis, I changed the Ricci password to 65peC&E$taFREU > and everything still worked as expected. Once at it, it should have been "65peCE$taFREU" (no & char), shouldn't it? > From your stand point I don't know if that needs to be coded around or what, > but at least we know how to reproduce the issue. Thanks for bringing up this part we should be more careful about. As a starter, I filed these bugs: - ricci (needs to understand the XML entities properly) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855121 (clients need to do a proper encoding into XML entities) - luci: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855112 - ccs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855117 - ccs_sync: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855120 Also based on studying some relevant parts of the ricci's code, I've added a few private suggestions under the umbrella of bug 849233. > Thanks again for sticking with me on this even if the cause was somewhat > silly. To be fair enough, no matter how unprobable the reason of not working correctly is (let's keep complex configuration errors aside), one can expect such things self-evident (via the messages, logs, etc.), not as an exercise left to the user and indirectly back to the maintainer :-) Thanks, Jan -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
