Eric wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Go ahead. Make a "slackhat". This is Linux you are encouraged to do so if
> > you think its the right thing to do.
>
> This is what I like about your posts, Alan. Of course I shouldn't be
> sitting around wishing for stuff, I ought to be mashing together
> two different distributions and see if I can graft SysV onto Slackware
> and BSDish onto RedHat. Bwahaha... then everyone can hate me!
Why not, Eric? That's what most of us do. If it's not available in the
distribution I'm using, I find it, implement it, and make a note for my
next build.
That I'm curently using RH 5.2 for configuration control
notwithstanding, I still prefer, in general terms, Slackware. The RPM
functionality just happened to appeal to me, since, in general terms, I
use Linux as a requirement to get things accomplished rather than to
play with kernels.
It's not worth getting snippy over.
d--
Gerry Creager | Never ascribe to Malice that
Mapping Sciences Laboratory | which can adequately be
Texas A&M University | explained by Stupidity.
409.845.7201 (Phone) | -- Lazerus Long
409.845.2273 (Fax)
409.228.7686 (Pager) --or-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
