On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 09:07:25PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:25:09PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > I just noticed that your shash version of hmac keeps the paded keys
> > on the transform. I assumed the hashing to be reentrant, so I
> > removed the locks arround the hash functions here.
> 
> The padded keys are in the transform because they never change
> unless you call setkey.  The assumption has always been that
> you should use one tfm per key.

Ah, yes of course.

> 
> > Is there a plan to move the paded keys to the request soon, 
> > or should we keep the locks for now and remove them later?
> 
> You don't need to lock it since the same assumption applies to
> AEAD.
> 

I came on it because I applied the pcrypt patches on top of this one
and I had to put the locks arround the hash functions to get it to work.
The problem is probaply somewhere else, I'll look at it again.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to