On Friday, July 19, 2013 03:03:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, July 18, 2013 04:08:14 PM Tim Chen wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 00:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On 7/18/2013 11:00 PM, Tim Chen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 12:47 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > > >> Tim Chen wrote: > > > >>>>> Your approach is quite complicated. I think something simpler like > > > >>>>> the > > > >>>>> following will work: > > > >>>> We cannot benefit from PCLMULQDQ. Is it acceptable for you? > > > >>> > > > >>> The following code in crct10dif-pclmul_glue.c > > > >>> > > > >>> static const struct x86_cpu_id crct10dif_cpu_id[] = { > > > >>> X86_FEATURE_MATCH(X86_FEATURE_PCLMULQDQ), > > > >>> {} > > > >>> }; > > > >>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, crct10dif_cpu_id); > > > >>> > > > >>> will put the module in the device table and get the module > > > >>> loaded, as long as the cpu support PCLMULQDQ. So we should be able > > > >>> to benefit. > > > >> Excuse me, how can crct10dif-pclmul.ko get loaded automatically? > > > >> Did you test CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_PCLMUL=m with below debug message? > > > > The code: > > > > > > > > static const struct x86_cpu_id crct10dif_cpu_id[] = { > > > > X86_FEATURE_MATCH(X86_FEATURE_PCLMULQDQ), > > > > {} > > > > }; > > > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, crct10dif_cpu_id); > > > > > > > > causes the following line to be added to modules.alias file: > > > > > > > > alias x86cpu:vendor:*:family:*:model:*:feature:*0081* crct10dif_pclmul > > > > > > > > This should cause udev to load the crct10dif_pclml module when cpu > > > > support the PCLMULQDQ (feature code 0081). I did my testing during > > > > development on 3.10 and the module was indeed loaded. > > > > > > > > However, I found that the following commit under 3.11-rc1 broke > > > > the mechanism after some bisection. > > > > > > > > commit ac212b6980d8d5eda705864fc5a8ecddc6d6eacc > > > > Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > > > Date: Fri May 3 00:26:22 2013 +0200 > > > > > > > > ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure > > > > > > > > Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is > > > > non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration > > > > and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the > > > > existing processor driver functionality. > > > > > > > > Rafael, can you check and see if this can be fixed so those optimized > > > > crypto modules for Intel cpu that support them can be loaded? > > > > > > I think this is an ordering issue between udev startup and the time when > > > devices are registered. > > > > Something that can be fixed? > > I'm sure it can be fixes, but I'm not sure whether it's a udev bug or real > breakage in the kernel yet. I need to figure out that part.
OK I wonder if the appended patch makes the issue go away for you? Rafael --- drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 24 +++++++++++++----------- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 14 ++++---------- drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -397,20 +397,14 @@ static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_add( result = -ENODEV; goto err; } - - result = acpi_bind_one(dev, pr->handle); - if (result) - goto err; - pr->dev = dev; dev->offline = pr->flags.need_hotplug_init; - /* Trigger the processor driver's .probe() if present. */ - if (device_attach(dev) >= 0) - return 1; + result = acpi_create_platform_device(device, id); + if (result > 0) + return result; - dev_err(dev, "Processor driver could not be attached\n"); - acpi_unbind_one(dev); + dev_err(dev, "Unable to create processor platform device\n"); err: free_cpumask_var(pr->throttling.shared_cpu_map); Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ int acpi_create_platform_device(struct a struct platform_device_info pdevinfo; struct resource_list_entry *rentry; struct list_head resource_list; - struct resource *resources; + struct resource *resources = NULL; int count; /* If the ACPI node already has a physical device attached, skip it. */ @@ -61,20 +61,22 @@ int acpi_create_platform_device(struct a INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list); count = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list, NULL, NULL); - if (count <= 0) + if (count < 0) { return 0; + } else if (count > 0) { + resources = kmalloc(count * sizeof(struct resource), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!resources) { + dev_err(&adev->dev, "No memory for resources\n"); + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list); + return -ENOMEM; + } + count = 0; + list_for_each_entry(rentry, &resource_list, node) + resources[count++] = rentry->res; - resources = kmalloc(count * sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!resources) { - dev_err(&adev->dev, "No memory for resources\n"); acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list); - return -ENOMEM; } - count = 0; - list_for_each_entry(rentry, &resource_list, node) - resources[count++] = rentry->res; - - acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list); memset(&pdevinfo, 0, sizeof(pdevinfo)); /* Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ #include <linux/cpuidle.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/acpi.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <acpi/processor.h> @@ -54,8 +55,8 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul Diefenbaugh"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ACPI Processor Driver"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); -static int acpi_processor_start(struct device *dev); -static int acpi_processor_stop(struct device *dev); +static int acpi_processor_start(struct platform_device *pdev); +static int acpi_processor_stop(struct platform_device *pdev); static const struct acpi_device_id processor_device_ids[] = { {ACPI_PROCESSOR_OBJECT_HID, 0}, @@ -64,10 +65,11 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id proce }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, processor_device_ids); -static struct device_driver acpi_processor_driver = { - .name = "processor", - .bus = &cpu_subsys, - .acpi_match_table = processor_device_ids, +static struct platform_driver acpi_processor_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "processor", + .acpi_match_table = processor_device_ids, + }, .probe = acpi_processor_start, .remove = acpi_processor_stop, }; @@ -222,22 +224,22 @@ static __cpuinit int __acpi_processor_st return result; } -static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_start(struct device *dev) +static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_start(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct acpi_device *device; - if (acpi_bus_get_device(ACPI_HANDLE(dev), &device)) + if (acpi_bus_get_device(ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev), &device)) return -ENODEV; return __acpi_processor_start(device); } -static int acpi_processor_stop(struct device *dev) +static int acpi_processor_stop(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct acpi_device *device; struct acpi_processor *pr; - if (acpi_bus_get_device(ACPI_HANDLE(dev), &device)) + if (acpi_bus_get_device(ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev), &device)) return 0; acpi_remove_notify_handler(device->handle, ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY, @@ -271,7 +273,7 @@ static int __init acpi_processor_driver_ if (acpi_disabled) return 0; - result = driver_register(&acpi_processor_driver); + result = platform_driver_register(&acpi_processor_driver); if (result < 0) return result; @@ -292,7 +294,7 @@ static void __exit acpi_processor_driver acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(); unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&acpi_cpu_notifier); acpi_processor_syscore_exit(); - driver_unregister(&acpi_processor_driver); + platform_driver_unregister(&acpi_processor_driver); } module_init(acpi_processor_driver_init); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html