On 8 May 2014 23:50, Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> wrote: > On 8 May 2014, at 12:22, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 7 May 2014 16:45, Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:49:32PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>>> This is a repost of the arm64 crypto patches that I have posted to the >>>> LAKML >>>> over the past months. They have now been verified on actual hardware >>>> (Cortex-A57) so if there are no remaining issues I would like to propose >>>> them >>>> for 3.16. >>>> >>>> Ard Biesheuvel (15): >>>> asm-generic: allow generic unaligned access if the arch supports it >>>> arm64: add abstractions for FPSIMD state manipulation >>>> arm64: defer reloading a task's FPSIMD state to userland resume >>>> arm64: add support for kernel mode NEON in interrupt context >>>> arm64/crypto: SHA-1 using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions >>>> arm64/crypto: SHA-224/SHA-256 using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions >>>> arm64/crypto: GHASH secure hash using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions >>>> arm64/crypto: AES using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions >>>> arm64/crypto: AES in CCM mode using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions >>>> arm64: pull in <asm/simd.h> from asm-generic >>>> arm64/crypto: AES-ECB/CBC/CTR/XTS using ARMv8 NEON and Crypto >>>> Extensions >>>> arm64/crypto: add shared macro to test for NEED_RESCHED >>>> arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions SHA1 >>>> arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions SHA2 >>>> arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions GHASH >>> >>> There are about 5 patches that make sense to me ;) and apart from a few >>> minor comments they look fine. >>> >>> There are the other 10 crypto patches that are beyond my knowledge. Do >>> you know anyone who could do a sanity check on them? Are there any tests >>> that would show the correctness of the implementation? >> >> I will re-send the 3 FPSIMD patches separately with your review >> comments addressed. > > Thanks. If you get another acked/reviewed-by tag on the rest of the > patches it’s even better (I plan to get the series in for 3.16, after > we do some tests internally as well). >
@Herbert, Jussi: care to share your opinion on the SHAx, GHASH and AES patches above? Herbert has already acked the ccm patch, but Catalin is requesting for more review and/or acknowledgements before merging these patches for arm64. Regards, Ard. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
