On 10/06/2014 08:52 PM, Sandy Harris wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Jason Cooper <ja...@lakedaemon.net> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 11:09:40PM -0400, Sandy Harris wrote:
...
There was recently a patch to the random driver to replace memset()
because, according to the submitter, gcc sometimes optimises memset()
away ...
memzero_explicit() is a good start, ...
As I see it, memzero_explicit() is a rather ugly kluge, albeit an
acceptable one in the circumstances.
Right.
A real fix would make memset() do the right thing reliably; if the
programmer puts in memset( x, 0, nbytes) then the memory should be
cleared, no ifs or buts. I do not know or care if that means changes
in the compiler or in the library code or even both, but the fix
should make the standard library code work right, not require adding a
new function and expecting everyone to use it.
That would be a desirable goal, ideally perhaps as a built-in from
the compiler itself, just as memset(). Applications such as openssh
implement for the very same purpose their bzero_explicit() variant
just as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html